| |
|
"The
message that Jesus brought was never a condemning
one... rather, a message of individual freedom, of
each of us being a manifestation of Divinity..."
|
| |
| |
|
Pastoral
Letters
In this section are six pastoral letters sent by the current coordinating bishop, James H. Burch, to members and friends of the diocese.
There is no obligation on the part of ordained members or others who feel themselves a part of this diocese to believe all that is written here, or in the way that it is written. This is offered by the current Coordinating Bishop of this diocese as a validly alternative Catholic Christian viewpoint, which readers may use to philosophically engage this topic.
1. Pastoral Letter on Catholic Pro Choice
2. Pastoral Letter on Catholic Church Leadership
3. Pastoral Letter on the Eucharist
4. Pastoral Letter on Homosexuality
5. Pastoral Letter on Marriage, Divorce and Reception of the Sacraments
6. Pastoral Letter on the Sacramentality of Life

Pastoral Letter
on
Pro Choice Catholicism
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
March 2006
Pro Choice Catholicism is fully “Catholic”
On February 28, 2006, Fifty-five Catholic Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives issued a statement that they have the right as good Catholics to respectfully disagree with the Church’s teaching on abortion, at least in their roles as representatives of all the people they represent. On March 10, 2006, three Roman Catholic bishops – Cardinal William Keeler of Baltimore, head of the bishops’ Pro-Life Activities Committee; Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick of Washington, DC, who heads a task force on Catholic politicians; and Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn, chairman of the bishops’ Domestic policy Committee - replied to the Democratic Catholic congressmen that, succinctly, there was no room to be good Catholics and to be a Pro-Choice legislator at the same time.
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit is served by this bishop, not of the Roman Rite but as thoroughly “Catholic” as the three Roman Catholic bishops who issued this statement, as “Catholic” as any Catholic bishop including the Pope. I respectfully disagree with the Roman Rite bishops’ position. I categorically state that there is room for differences on this issue, both from the historical stances of the Church, from the learning we continually acquire as to how God works in this world, and from traditions existent within the worldwide Catholic Church in all its complexity and shades. I would further like to encourage the Catholic congressmen that their Catholic faith allows them to encompass their current beliefs and practices.
The reality is that theological opinion on abortion has been far from unanimous over the past two millennia. Elected representatives who may be Catholic are free to be Pro Choice, and publicly so.
“Authentic” teaching of the Church
Catholic teaching is only the belief of the Church if it is “received” by the people of the Church. That means that anything promulgated by the hierarchy which does not resonate as true in at least most of the Catholic people is opinion and not essential to Catholic belief. Polls show that roughly half of all Catholics, like most of the American population, believe that abortion can be allowed in certain cases and that the decision belongs to the woman. Therefore, the Pro Life position is not infallible teaching of the church, and not necessarily a requirement of being a good Catholic, no matter how many priests and bishops (and even popes) say so.
There are also many priests who are secretly Pro Choice, though they could never say so, and would never say so if asked. They know full well that they would be ostracized from their clerical fraternity and silenced by their superiors.
When are souls “created?”
The Pro Life argument is based on the assumption that souls are created for specific bodies at the time of the formation of those bodies. Who says? Certainly Jesus never touched this subject directly or indirectly. Not even modern medicine would venture as to when a “soul” began, having as difficult time, as it does, with when a “soul” actually enters a body (or, as usually stated another way: “when life begins”). I think it is equally plausible to believe that all souls, as individuated expressive manifestations of God, have existed since the beginning of time, perhaps prior to that.
Moreover, isn’t it a bit narrow of us to think that souls, which realistically may have existed beyond our earliest understanding, and which will live eternally, have only this 60-100 year lifetime to get it all right? What tells us that this incredibly short episode within eternal existence is “it”? Certainly nothing in the words of Jesus tell us that.
The Pro Life position has to be based on the belief that each soul is created by God for a specific body as that body is being formed in the womb of its mother, and that, if aborted, that soul is forever blocked from further life and shut off from God. Under this scenario, God notices a couple in Western Africa copulating and cranks out another soul (“Off you go to the Congo, little soul … luck of the draw!”). Frankly, that scenario presumes a rather strange “God.” The God of the Judeo-Christian heritage is All Loving, compassionate, the source and the life from which all reality draws its continued existence.
Jesus said “the Father and I are One,” and “you are in me, and I am in you.” The Aramaic language which Jesus spoke (not the Greek language of the original Gospels or the Latin of the earliest translation we have existent [the Latin Vulgate of St. Jerome]) gives us a greater vision of what Jesus taught than we are used to in current Gospel translations. When he spoke of the “Kingdom of God,” the “Reign of God,” and the “Kingdom of Heaven” 140 times in the Gospels, the Aramaic words Jesus used actually meant “the all-pervasive presence of the sovereign power of God in All That Is.” He never meant the Kingdom of Heaven is some future promise, but that it is “at hand,” it is “within.” God is within all that is. Nothing is outside the divinity of God, because it is not possible for anything to be outside the divinity of God. Anything that exists, exists as a unique manifestation of God. God is the life and the existence of anything that is, including each soul, born or unborn, in this life or on the other side of life. Our God is good and loving, and never forsakes us.
We cannot thwart God’s Will
Do we really think that if we humans decide that a soul should not come to this particular body by ceasing its formation early on through an abortion (just as, in like manner, we humans decided to begin it in the first place), we actually stop God’s timeless purpose for that soul? Do we really have that kind of power that we can thwart God’s “will”? Hardly! Isn’t it short-sighted to think that this life, no matter how abbreviated or how long, or how re-directed if the body is diverted as a home for a soul in this lifetime through an abortion, is essential to any soul’s never-ending journey, just because it is the limited perspective we happen to have now? If souls exist eternally before and after this lifetime, then they continue to be the image and likeness of God, temples of the Holy Spirit, sanctified, reflections of their creative God throughout all eternity.
None of us are capable of thwarting God’s will, because God would then be deficient to that degree, and God is never deficient. As we co-create with God, we have been given the right to make decisions in concert with God. Each soul has trillions of myriad options open to it in the future. No abortion stops God’s interminable plan dead in its tracks; no single instance (a mere blip on the eternal screen of experiential existence) sidetracks the soul (a unique manifestation of God) from its eternal journey of self discovery … because God has given each soul never-ending life.
God acts through, with and in us
Finally, there is an essential question as to whether God creates, sustains and moves this universe forward acting as a singular Director, calling all the shots, or whether God creates, sustains and moves this universe forward acting as a Symphonic Conductor, calling forth the blossoming of the universe through the decisions, energies and judgments of all God’s manifestations (i.e., originally spirits and angels, and now joined by us human/spiritual creatures).
The Jesus who respected everyone he met and told them that God was within them seems to be saying that God acts through us and in us. Jesus was so full of respect for the individual conscience that he only healed those who asked, he found no person out of bounds for him, and he did not condemn even those who killed him.
Not being yet the fullness of God ourselves, we can obviously never thwart God’s plan for souls (the expressed individuated life-forces of God) to ultimately, through the billions (trillions?) of years’ evolutionary process and through eternity, experience the Wholeness of ourselves as the pieces of God that we are. But it certainly looks as if God chooses to let this process go forward with us as co-creators. All our decisions have value. Through the ups and downs of it all, God emerges in creation and in us.
Brain wave activity
If the cessation of brain wave activity is considered the critical factor for determining the end of life, why should not the inception of brain wave activity also be considered the critical factor for the beginning of life?
“Potential Life”
If “potential life” must be safeguarded and be preserved so that nascent life be brought to fruition, when must that safeguarding begin? Most human beings carry within themselves the potential for hundreds, thousands even, of offspring. Does Pro Life theory require that anything which would curtail the full potential of thousands of children per person be outlawed, to ensure that the full potential is born? Is each male to save and protect the millions upon millions of sperm his body periodically and automatically expels? At what point does life become “actual” and not just “potential?” At what time is official protection reasonable and right? Thoughtful people can legitimately differ on this.
Pro Choice is as valid a Catholic alternative as is Pro Life
No Catholic and no Christian is compelled to be Anti-Abortion, or Pro-Life, though Christians may certainly determine that they should be. Likewise, no Catholic and no Christian either must be or must not be Pro-Choice, though Christians may certainly determine that they should be. We are all called to use our good sense and decide for ourselves. Nobody has legitimate spiritual or moral authority over our individual conscience. This is good Catholic theology. This is good common sense. Nobody can be expelled from his or her religion for following his or her conscience. Nobody else is ever given that right over another.
Churches are dead wrong to coerce their members into what the church’s hierarchical party line is. The Church is the people of God … ALL of them, not just its administrative leadership. What the Church believes is what we the people of the Church (all the people) believe.
Catholic politicians are always advised to follow their consciences. When a Catholic politician does that, he or she is a fully-participating member of the Church, of the Body of Christ. They cannot be expelled from the life of God by a mere human person; nobody (neither pope, bishop nor priest) has the right or the ability to do that.
Conscience as the Defining Requirement to Judgment
The teaching of Thomas Aquinas is the bedrock of traditional, conservative Catholic theology. Thomas states conclusively that conscience is to be followed, in every case, after thoughtful inquiry. For the Catholic, Christian or other person who follows her conscience to the point of having an abortion, after having wrestled with this problem to the best of her ability (as she knows it, not as others state it should be), she suffers no moral judgment or condemnation. God honors her choices.
Catholics, like all human beings, are always obliged to follow, first of all, their consciences. This concept of individual conscience first is essential to the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, and is taught in seminaries and Catholic universities to this day as fundamental Catholic teaching. A person who takes the time to inform himself or herself is called by God to follow his or her conscience.
The Goodness Inherent in both Pro-Life and Pro-Choice Supporters
What we can all honor the Pro-Life supporters for is their respect for life. No one can doubt their sincerity or dispute that the “life” they fight for is all-important. After all, in so many ways, the word “God” can be equated with the word “Life.” In the Aramaic language Jesus spoke, the word “ruha” meant breath of all humans, breath of all animals, wind (“breath of the earth”), tidal movement, and all movement within physicality. If the people of his time had known about the movement of particles around the nucleus of the atom, that probably would have been “ruha” as well. The same exact word also meant “spirit,” and Jesus elevated this by calling it the “HOLY spirit.” For Jesus, God/Divinity is infused in every nook and cranny of physicality. Everything is then sacred. To the extent that the traits of God show up more in certain forms of physicality than in others – the highest we know of being human beings – to that extent God/Life is more to be honored in those higher forms.
However, the question really is: are we required to act as if this particular experience of life is all there is, that life is not enduring and does not have an eternal journey, that God is only capable of giving us this one experience to determine our eternity, that God is really not all-loving and all-infusing and not permeating all creation … with the result that some of God’s creation falls away and ends separate from that which is its continuous source of life? No, greater faith in God – based on the constant message of Jesus regarding God’s overwhelming loving presence in all that is – tells us that God never lets go, that we are destined to be as Jesus was and to do greater things than he did, that we are obviously not there after one life’s term on this earth, and that our souls (which have no galactic bus to catch) have eternity to get back to our Source, Which never lets us go.
Humans cannot thwart that, but we can use our God-given freedom of choice to choose the eternal circumstances under which we each arrive at that eventual destination.
P.S. There is still another, tangential though important, aspect to consider: reincarnation. Though not a necessity in our understanding of what life means, reincarnation nevertheless intrudes as a significant mitigating factor, and consideration of it may enlighten our understanding of how God equals Life.
Reincarnation either is or it isn’t true, and what IS – beyond our current understanding – is happening anyway, whether we believe it or not.
Do we each get only one chance?
What makes us think that a soul gets only one chance at a life here on earth? Why would God, in concert with God’s co-creators (us) not continue the process of that soul entering another body or enter some other form of experiential existence? Perhaps a soul had never entered the body of an aborted baby. Perhaps it had. If it had, then there was a purpose for that short visit, an experience that short-visiting soul had graciously given for the experience of the aborting parents. God makes good out of everything. We should not presume that belief in reincarnation is not Christian. A great many Christians and Catholics believe in many lifetimes for each soul.
Half the world believes in reincarnation, but it is presumed to be something that is not in keeping with Christianity. However, many Christians believed in reincarnation from the time of Christ to beyond the Fourth Century, and many believe in it today. Many of the early church Fathers taught it openly, e.g., Origen, Justin Martyr, Jerome, Clemens Alexandrinus, and Plotinus. But St. Augustine’s anti-reincarnation viewpoint won out, and he succeeded in scrubbing it from Christian teachings.
The Scriptures do not speak of rebirth definitively. The Scriptures do not speak of many things which may have been presumed or which may have been budding, nascent understandings. But the references to multiple lives is so casually passed by, that we now tend to squeeze whatever understandings the people of Jesus’ day were coming to sense into the later interpretations we have been taught. Perhaps there were other mentions of reincarnation in the Bible which were purged in the first few centuries when church leaders were translating from one language to another, selecting texts considered primary, and rewriting as they thought proper. Yet these sayings did remain:
His disciples asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"
- John 9:2
How could the man who was born blind have already sinned, unless he had lived an earlier life?
Once when Jesus was praying in solitude, and the disciples were with him, he asked them, "Who do the crowds say that I am?" They said in reply, "John the Baptist; others, Elijah; still others, 'One of the ancient prophets has arisen.'"
- Luke 9: 18-19
The apostles themselves answered Jesus that many of His followers thought Jesus to be the reincarnation of an earlier prophet. Jesus did not correct this concept of reincarnation, but went on to explain how He is more than that.
Then the disciples asked him, "Why do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?" He said in reply, "Elijah will indeed come and restore all things; but I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him but did to him whatever they pleased. So also will the Son of Man suffer at their hands." Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.
- Matthew 17: 10-13
That is about as plain a recognition as of continuous lived experiences as there could be. Jesus tells his disciples that John the Baptist had been Elijah in a prior life. It is quite plausible for Christians to believe that we are each entities that choose to come back to this physical world, to be continually re-incarnated, until we shall have achieved the perfection of God, as shown to us as an example and fully lived first by Jesus Christ. It is not necessary to believe in reincarnation to also be Pro Choice, but it does add yet another element of confirming support.
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing

Pastoral Letter
on
Catholic Church Leadership
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
April 20, 2005
The election of Joseph Ratzinger as the Roman Catholic Church’s new Pope Benedict XVI is a conclusive sign that the leadership engine of the church’s train is only remotely connected to the people in that train. Catholic theology, brought to a higher level of fruition in the Second Vatican Council, teaches that the people of God are themselves the Church. The Church is not the hierarchy … though you would never know that truth based on the distance between the hierarchy and the people today and on the hierarchy’s totally un-Christian chokehold on power.
Pope John Paul II, a man of many talents and a singular and most conservative experience of spirituality (rather than an admirer of God’s many beautiful expressions in peoples, cultures and perspectives), singularly appointed all but two of those who chose his successor. He stacked the deck with those of his own limited vision. He also appointed approximately 90% of the world’s Roman Catholic bishops over his 26 year “reign”. The dioceses over which these appointed bishops “ruled” had virtually no say whatsoever regarding who would be their “leader”. The “laity” (the word “lay” literally means “uninformed”, as in “a lay opinion”) had no say at all, zilch, nada, zero. The priests in each diocese – themselves products of a dictatorial, paternalistic, authoritarian leadership structure – had input that was so cursory as to be virtually non-existent.
This was not always the case. The word “pontiff” comes from two Latin words meaning “bridge” and “builder”. In early centuries of the church – after the concept of a “pope” had evolved into being more than just another bishop – the pope was considered the “bridge-builder”, the one who kept the peace and who brought different factions together. It was considered inappropriate for him to take a position that would fracture Christian unity. Today, thanks to the last couple of hundred years, he is considered by his appointed leadership to be virtually a spiritual dictator. In the early 19th century, only a handful of bishops were appointed by Rome; the great majority were either elected by their dioceses or appointed by the civil authorities in their countries. To counter some abuses that were occurring with civil appointments, Rome did not reform the democratic process for the selection of bishops but rather usurped to itself the practice (it is not a “right”) of appointing whomever it chose. The result has been a complete disenfranchisement between the “leadership” and the Roman Catholic people. These appointed bishops might as well be from Mars. It is as if the United States of America somewhere along the line had initiated the rule that only residents of Key West are allowed to be President, and that that President appointed only Key West residents as senators for all states, congressmen from all districts across the US, and governors of the various states. Sound ridiculous? Well, that is how the Roman Catholic Church propagates its leadership today.
All during the many days of commentary on the Catholic Church by the news media (during which, by the way, almost exclusively conservative commentators were interviewed, and virtually all men to the exclusion of women), there was much bemoaning of the virtual abandonment of the Roman Catholic Church by Europeans (who go to church only in the single digits) and Americans (only 27% of American Catholics go regularly to church services). This was seen not as a failure of the Church to provide any kind of intellectual and pastoral stimulation, but rather as a form of spiritual depravity of the people.
Anyone who really knows these non-church-going Americans and Europeans knows that they are, by and large, extraordinarily decent people. They care about becoming more loving people; they care about others; especially those who have less; and they have a finely-tuned sense to seek personal happiness. Yet they are condemned and tsskd-tsskd by men in red dresses as being morally untethered.
On the other hand, much was made of the spread of Roman Catholicism in the developing nations of South America and Africa. These are the “good” people, close to God, not caught up in the nasty consumerism and selfishness of the Western mentality. This is the future of the Church, the model for humanity, the hope for salvation of the immoral Western culture.
The reality is that this is just more rationalization from Church leaders who do not want their privileged status to change. They are, in fact, incapable of seeing anything other than through their own tinted glasses. They have created their own plush surroundings, and they like it a lot. Don’t expect voluntary surrender (note the election of Pope Benedict XVI).
The Roman Catholic Church has always been a lover of the poor, and the greatest aid to the poor for all of recorded history. Because of this, people who have little or nothing – who are totally unconcerned with dogmas, doctrines and moral commands – flock to the Church, seeing its genuine love for them. But what happens inevitably is that the poor over time become affluent and educated, as most have done in Europe and America. They are then no longer a recipient of the Church’s love for the poor, but have moved into the category of the New Sheep needing to be morally directed and intellectually constrained. And they go out the back door as fast as the new poor are coming in the Church’s front door.
Does anyone really doubt that as South America and Africa become more affluent and educated, their populations will also follow the historic paths of America and Europe?
This enormous gap between a Roman Catholic leadership run self-servingly wild and a populace being pablum-fed is destroying the Church. Not until parishes are controlled by the people themselves, until bishops are chosen by their own dioceses, until the heavy hand of dictatorial edict is lifted, until spirituality is seen by the Church as not just filling pews but of enlightening minds – will the Roman Catholic Church really flourish. There is a long, long, long way to go. Sheer numbers do not commitments make.
Women priests, married priests, rational acceptance of contraception/divorce/gay people/etc., less infatuation with sexual practices of the populace, practical respect for the primacy of conscience (taught as fundamental Catholic theology for centuries, but now relegated to textbooks instead of practical life) – all these are secondary matters. The most fundamental teaching of Jesus – the recognition of the presence of God in every thing and in every person, and the deep respect and honor that goes with that recognition – is missing. And it is essential to Jesus, if not to “Christianity” as it is lived today.
There are now, within the Catholic Church (the “Catholic Church” being more than the “Roman” Catholic Church), thousands upon thousands of baptized individuals – ordained and not – who have been blessed to conclude correctly that they do not need the permission or the validation of this leadership class, so self-aggrandizingly aloof, to be what they are, the people of God. There are many non-geographic Catholic, but NOT Roman, dioceses, headed by Catholic bishops with apostolic succession just like their Roman counterparts, which have dispensed with the non-essentials, in favor of living a practical, Jesus-led, truly “Catholic” life (Catholic fundamental theology is that we are made in the image and likeness of God, that we are temples of the Holy Spirit, and that we are sanctified) in this magnificent universe given to us by God to experience the deepest reality of Who We Are. You will see more and more of this in the years to come..
There are now, within the Roman Catholic Church, thousands upon thousands of deeply spiritual reformers, who are crushed by the usurpation of their church by the ultra conservatives. This reality is now clearly evident in the election of Joseph Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI. The church is now – thanks to the 26 years of appointments by John Paul II – completely dominated by a mind set that demands conformity and certainty, rather than that which honors experience, wisdom and understanding. These reformers have stuck with the Roman Catholic Church through thick and thin, because it is extremely difficult to abandon one’s cultural and familial socialization, especially when it is drilled into one’s head that such orientation is more than cultural choices; it is “God’s Will!”
However, the election of Benedict XVI will be a tipping point. It will cause the damn to break and an unprecedented number of thinking Roman Catholics will expand their concept of Catholicism to include their following their consciences, staying “Catholic” but abandoning the Roman extremism that is not life-enriching and Jesus-experiencing.
Perhaps the election of Pope Benedict XVI is just what the Church needed … just not in the way most think. They might yet clean this place up, without ever picking up a broom.
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing

Pastoral Letter on the Eucharist
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
June 1, 2004
There has been much written in the news lately, and thus much resultant confusion, about who can and who cannot receive communion. Catholic politicians who do not enforce the Vatican’s teachings on abortion in their public roles as legislators, and recently people who wear sashes to identify themselves as gay or lesbian, are among those presently debated as not being able to receive communion at some Catholic churches. More groups could be identified as outside the pale in the future. A commission of notable Roman Catholic prelates is now studying this issue, even as a few of the most conservative bishops break loose and issue edicts barring pro-choice Catholic politicians from the sacrament.
I would like to point out a few principles, so that you might make up your own minds on this issue. I speak as a Catholic bishop, but not of the Roman rite. However, truth, which we each must seek ourselves, is not limited to any particular rite or church. What Jesus said and what he meant is as it is. It is up to each of us to interpret for ourselves, listening to as many points of view as possible, what it is that Jesus calls us to.
Of key importance is PRIMACY OF CONSCIENCE. As followers of Jesus, we also are called to act as he did in the treatment of others. We see that Jesus always told stories with morals to be interpreted by his listeners, and he often asked questions like, “What do you think?” Jesus did not command; he invited. Thus, primacy of conscience has been the most fundamental of Catholic postures, even invoked today through the teachings of the most prominent of Roman Catholic theologians, Thomas Aquinas, who taught that conscience was first.
Secondly, we must get our priorities in order. From the earliest days of Christianity, “adherence to orthodox teachings” was not the definition of a Christian, but “the way they love one another” was. Christians were followers of “The Way.” There were no official dogmas, creeds or doctrines in the church until 325 C.E., when Emperor Constantine, who was not yet himself a Christian, approved the dogmas of the Council of Nicea, which he had called, reviewed and approved ... a shaky start to dogmas. Jesus seemed almost totally unconcerned with the definitions and codification of laws and rules. He spoke virtually all the time about the abiding presence of our loving God in all that is and in every human person, and invited us to look for that and to see it as our way to joy and peace. Such an approach seems far better suited to a church that would be like Jesus than the demand to adhere to human, time/culture-bound definitions.
Finally, we must look at what the Eucharist – communion, the body and blood of Jesus – really means. Jesus did not teach for three years, and then on the night before he died give us something new, out of the blue. The Eucharist is the physical expression of what Jesus had been teaching his whole ministry. Incessantly Jesus had spoken about the “kingdom of God,” the “reign of God,” and the “kingdom of heaven.” We can count 140 references in the gospels to these ideas. In the Aramaic language Jesus spoke, what he was saying and what his audience was hearing was: “the all-pervasive and life-giving presence of God in all that is.” Thus, Jesus whole message was that God lives in, gives life and existence to, everything and everybody. We do not exist outside of the energy, power, intelligence, spirit and life that IS God. It is impossible for any of us or anything to be separate from God. That was the essential message of Jesus. Not that we must obey his (or the church’s) directives in order to get the prize of heaven, but that we already have heaven. Not that God will love us if only we do what is prescribed, but that God already does love us. Not that we shall have eternal life, but that we do. Jesus mission was to help us to see that, so that we might avoid choosing that which causes us live in a temporary “hell.”
And so, Jesus gave us the Eucharist as a physical reminder of all that he had been teaching his whole ministry. We do not have to make ourselves “worthy” to approach and receive the body and blood of Jesus. The very gift of this sacrament is a statement that we – all of us – already ARE worthy. Communion is a visible sign of Jesus’ fundamental teaching: that God already lives within each and every one of us, that we ourselves and everything that is, ARE the body of God.
Thus, everybody is worthy, and everyone may receive the sacrament of the Eucharist.
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing

Pastoral Letter on Homosexuality
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
November 15, 2006
Of all the arguments throughout the centuries, pro and con, regarding homosexuality, this topic is actually illuminated by one quick insight, a singular truth.
The life and teachings of Jesus was about loving and accepting all people. Jesus said not one word about homosexuality, and very little about sexual matters at all. To say the least, this was not his preoccupation. What he certainly did, however, was to bring a New Message of love, a radical turning on its head of the judgmentalism of the past, into a recognition of Divinity Within and of God’s equal and unequivocal love for every human being.
The Roman Catholic Bishops of the United States, meeting a couple of years ago in Baltimore, freshly condemned homosexuality all over again, saying that it is “objectively disordered,” “not [in] accord with the natural purpose of sexuality” (as though that were evident on its face), and that homosexual acts are “sinful” and “never morally acceptable.” These are the same group of men who continue to tell women the details of regulating their feminine bodies. This group of overwhelmingly elderly men, who are supposed to have no contact with sexuality, also tell homosexuals that their way of life “do[es] not lead to true human happiness.”
How sad. There is another Catholic way, a “truer” Catholic way.
God is love, according to the most fundamental teaching of Jesus in the Gospels, and so, to feel love is to experience God. Sometimes the feeling of love can be light and fleeting, sometimes passionate, sometimes rapturously consuming. But always, in some way or another, it is the experience of God, who is love. This is, then, the end of the debate about whether such experience comes from God, and whether or not God loves homosexuals and accepts their loving style. The God who gives love, loves its recipients.
God is not much more interested in genatalia than in earlobes or elbows. God gives all things as tools for us to use to become more loving people. God is concerned with the direction of our hearts. God loves every one of us, each on our unique journey of experiencing the Divinity which infuses us with life and purpose.
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing

Pastoral Letter on
Marriage, Divorce, and the
Reception of the Sacraments
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
March 2007
In July of 2002, the Vatican declared, once again and with renewed force, that those who divorce and remarry cannot receive the sacrament of communion unless they abstain from sex. The Vatican says that this ruling is “derived from divine law” and indicated it may not be changed in the future.
This proclamation out of the Vatican Curia is not only incorrect, it is harmful and damaging to people. As a fully “Catholic” diocese not of the Roman Rite, we are compelled to offer an alternative, fully-Catholic, legitimately-Christian teaching, so that Christians may determine what is proper for them, using their God-given consciences and their God-given gifts of free choice.
Marriage
Marriage is a gift of God, bound by a sacred covenant. It is the individuals who love each other and pledge their devotion to each other who are the instruments, the ministers, of this great sacrament to each other. A priest is a witness on behalf of the Church, which is the communion of all the people of God who adhere to the teachings of Jesus, the Christ, and usually the priest is also a witness on behalf of the state.
Because marriage is a freely-given gift of God, it is arrogant and abusive for anyone who is not God to presume to determine whether or not any person or couple shall actually be able to enjoy this freely-given gift. God is love, so that those who feel love, experience God. Therefore, those who have been married in the past, and who are later given the love of another as a gift of God once again, are free to enjoy that gift. They are blessed by God with the love of another, which finds its conclusion in the dedication to that other, which is marriage.
An ecclesiastical annulment process is an affront to the grace of God. The laws of divorce within Christendom have changed constantly throughout history. Biblical scholarship recognizes that references to divorce within the Old and New Testaments were aimed at rectifying abuses which existed then, so that they were in response to the demands of the times. The questionable and time-sensitive biblical matrimonial adjustments stand in weak contrast to the very clear message of the New Testament that God is Love and that we find God by loving others. Moreover, nothing could be more clear than, “judge not, that you be not judged.”
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit – this portion within Catholicism – therefore, affirms that divorced people are free to participate again in the deepest participation humans can make with one another, marriage. To love another is to know God. To feel love is to experience God.
Communion
Participating in the Eucharist, the meal of Jesus’ body and blood, is not a reward for good behavior. It is a physical statement, a reenactment of our belief that God lives in all.
At the core of all physical matter, the place where physical matter comes into being, there is a pervasive Oneness of Energy, an energy that vibrates in such a way that it at times appears as energy and at times as particles. From this arises sub-atomic particles, then atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, “inanimate” matter and life. Infused within this energy is an Intelligence that is beyond our human comprehension, in that it holds itself together, identifies itself as what it is, relates to other things, and has the innate ability to cluster together to form the complexity of the universe – from the most minute to the most complex of physical existence. This pervasive Energy and Intelligence is also Spirit, Life, and Power.
Because Energy, Intelligence, Spirit, Life and Power are the very words that would best sum up our understanding of “God,” it follows that everything exists within this Divinity; this Divinity lives within everything; and everything is a manifestation of God. God did not just make us and then keep an eye on us; rather, we arise as individuations within the Totality which is God. It follows, then, that everything already is the body and blood of God. “The Kingdom of God is within.” When Jesus took the ordinary things of common meals of his time, bread and wine, he said this was his body and blood. It is the body and blood of God, as Jesus is the expression, the body and blood, of God. As we are also the expression, the body and blood of God. As all creation is the body and blood of God.
When we designate the bread and the wine as sacred elements to recognize there the body and the blood of Jesus, we choose the bread and the wine as sacred elements to remind us that Jesus is really present in them, as God is really present in all of creation, especially in other people. Communion is the statement of the reality we affirm, that God lives in all, so that we may hold all creation and all other people in awe, in respect and in honor. This was the gift of Jesus, to help us remember that deep reality.
The gospels indicate that Jesus gave communion to everyone present. There is no mention of anybody being excluded for any reason. Jesus even gave communion to Judas, who he knew had already betrayed him in his heart.
Communion is not a reward to a person for being ritualistically pure. We are not excluded for being unworthy. Jesus showed us by his acceptance of everyone that we are all worthy already, because God lives in us already. Communion is meant to strengthen our recognition of the reality within which we live, and thus to become better and more loving persons.
Everyone is welcome to communion who wishes to receive it. We cannot imagine Jesus turning away divorced people, public “sinners,” various denominations of Christians, or even non-Christians. Above all, communion is the celebration of the reality of God’s extravagant love for all humanity. All are welcome.
Sex
Religions seem to have an unholy fixation on sex. Genitalia are tools, as are hands and other body parts. What matters is the inclination of our hearts: do we choose love, or do we choose selfish alienation. All sorts of things are instruments used in the carrying out of our heart’s intention, but it is the intention itself that matters. To say that divorced and remarried individuals must refrain from sex if they are to receive the sacraments is absurd, as most thinking individuals know. The emperor has no clothes here.
Conclusion
This language is bold and regretfully seems confrontational. It is necessary because the language out of the Vatican is imperial, disassociated from human reality, dictatorial, insensitive to the ebb and flow of life, and damaging to real spiritual growth. Yet there is good sense in the whole community of the people of God, and most Catholics and Christians who are not part of the hierarchy agree with these common-sense theological realities. Many Roman priests and bishops disagree with the Vatican on these matters as well, but are afraid to say so publicly. Within the Roman form of Catholicism, the “doctrine” of infallibility is always predicated upon the infallible proclamations being received as accepted by the faithful. Obviously, the teachings on divorce, remarriage, reception of sacraments and over-concentration on sexual restrictions are not practiced by most Catholics or by most Christians, and thus are not “received.”
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing

Pastoral Letter on the Sacramentality of Life
The Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
Easter Sunday, March 23, 2008
The Body and Blood of Jesus
and the Sacramental Nature of Life
as expressed in Christianity, in Catholicism
and in the Catholic Diocese of One Spirit
Sacramentality has been considered the key element of Catholicism since at least the Middle Ages. The Eucharist, as the real presence of the Body and Blood of Jesus, has been not only Catholicism’s most defining and uniquely visible element, but also the chief measuring rod by which others are considered “in” or “out” of the Catholic Church.
In actuality, as in most things religious and institutional, much of the beauty and spectacular truths within these hallmarks have been covered over so massively that their original intent is difficult for most people to recognize at all. We who have concluded that the message of Jesus, the way he encouraged us to lead our lives, the roadmap he left for us – that all this is of incalculable value – want to make absolutely certain that we come as close as possible to following what he actually said and did. So we must take a new and closer look at Sacraments and the Eucharist.
The Sacramentality of Life
Anyone who gives many speeches comes up with a Stump Speech – the essentials that he or she wants to get across every time, a careful presentation in which none of the main ingredients of his or her ideas be left out. From a reading of the Gospels, it seems evident that Jesus’ stump speech was The Beatitudes.
“Blessed are the poor … blessed are the meek … blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice …” All of this has come to be recognized as beautiful and profound to us Christians, and also as a good way to live even by those who are not Christians. And, yet, how many of us really want to be “poor?” How many of us consider that way of life to be more a “religious” value than a deeply human one? Not many college courses are offered on how to become the best poor person.
Jesus spoke 2,000 years ago, in the context of a completely different mindset. In the Aramaic language he spoke, so massively different from the Greek in which the Gospels were written, a “poor” person was not someone who had nothing. A “poor” person in the Aramaic frame of mind was someone who – no matter whether he or she had a little or a lot – put integrity, honor, love, compassion, justice, etc. first. A “poor” person was someone who had his priorities in order, or who worked to get them there. This, then, is not a solely “religious” value, but rather one that all people of good will can identify with.
A “meek” person was not someone who liked to be slapped around. A meek person was someone who could empathize with others. Someone who could say, “This is truth as I see it, but – given your history, culture, experiences – if you see your truth as something else, then I can accept that for you.” In other words, a “meek” person was someone who could put themselves in someone else’s shoes and accept them for who they are. Again, this is a human, not purely religious, trait which all people of good will can find enriching.
And so it goes through the Beatitudes. The conclusion an Aramaic language listener would come to, who had heard Jesus’ giving his Beatitudes stump speech, was the very Aramaic concept that we “breathe in and out the universe.” Jesus was telling us that every moment of every day is where we put into action the way of life that constantly tries to keep our priorities in order, that identifies and empathizes with other people, that looks out for the person who has less.
Real spirituality for Jesus wasn’t about just knocking off some rituals, filling your playbook.
In order to make this very mystical lesson more practical and easier to understand, Jesus told very earthy stories – we call them parables – to get the ideas across to his listeners. Throughout the many parables, the singular and overwhelming theme was the “Kingdom of God,” the “Reign of God,” and the “Kingdom of Heaven.” He spoke of this 140 times, so often that nothing else even came close. And, once again, the Aramaic meaning was much, much different from what we 21st Century people conjure up. To the Aramaic language listening audience, all this meant the “all-pervasive and life-giving presence of God in everything NOW.” Jesus said it was “at hand” (in everything we touch) and “within” (each and every one of us).
This blends harmoniously with an Aramaic word in heavy usage in that day, “ruha.” Ruha meant 1) my breath, your breath, the breath of every human being; 2) the breath of every animal, bird, fish, living thing; 3) the “wind,” which they called the “breath of the earth;” 4) by extrapolation, any physical movement, such as the tides, waves coming off a fire at night or a rock in the sun; 5) we must add that if the people of Jesus’ time knew about electrons and protons orbiting around the nucleus of the atom, this most certainly would have also been “ruha;” and then, most importantly for our understanding, 6) ruha also meant “spirit.”
It was this “spirit” that Jesus elevated to call the “Holy” Spirit. The expression of God that is the Holy Spirit does not consist of a ghost or a wisp that appears in a poof from time to time. The Holy Spirit is the Stuff within which and out of which everything exists. It is the movement that constitutes life and existence. It is the sine qua non of all that is physical. It is the organizing intelligence within the otherwise chaotic soup of matter. It is the energy that likes beneath the atom and has pushed physical matter first into existence in the Big Bang, and which continues to push it into existence at every moment in time and in every spot in the universe.
So, then, Jesus’ message was that Everything IS a manifestation of God.
God is the most “secular” element in the universe, because every last speck of dust on every planet IS a unique expression of God, who consciously gives it its existence. Within this context, Jesus told us that every moment of our unique existence is important, as we “breathe in and out the universe.” (It is certainly not just about going to church and reading the Bible … these are just tools toward the life he invites us to.) And he told us that we achieve our life’s purpose if we live it in a manor that struggles to keep our priorities in order, to empathize with others, to look out for those who have less.
Every moment of our life is, then, by definition, sacred. “Sacraments” or “sacred moments” are every moment.
We recognize many moments as especially sacred, especially “sacramental,” and we celebrate those moments. The number of “sacraments” has varied throughout the centuries. Who could ever state emphatically that there are an eternal specified number? Most people do not ever experience the sacrament of Ordination. But many experience another sacred moment, the sacrament, of the birth of a child. Most of us have gone through the difficult but sacred time of the sickness or death of a loved one – they way we are profoundly moved and recognize a deep oneness with the other through such an experience. Many have loved their pets and found there a celebration of life, joy and God. Some of us had lived the hell of divorce, and then blossomed from its death to its resurrection, as we have used it to strengthen our souls and more radically chosen our best selves. All of these but begin to touch the myriad expressions of the Holy Spirit’s bursting forth in sacred events in the unique lives of all God’s children.
Every moment is life is sacred and sacramental. Occasional powerful moments in each of our lives occur, which are exceptionally sacred and meaningful, Sacramental. Many entail rituals which celebrate the existence of such a sacred happenings, and which often strengthen them and call them to the fore to be lived more forcefully.
This is what is at the essence of Christianity’s celebration of sacraments. Sacramentality is not merely an essential Catholic characteristic, but it is also an essential Christian characteristic and it is an essentially human characteristic.
The message of Jesus works for everyone. He did not come to say, “Here are a bunch of bizarre things for you to believe, and some exotic practices for you to take up, an organization which you must join – which you would never otherwise choose to do on your own. And if you believe and do all these strange things, God will surely know you love Him, because why otherwise would any sane person ever believe and do all this?” No, Jesus rather came to say, “here is how the universe works; here is how God set things up to be; if you align yourself with the meaning in it all, you will achieve happiness and joy faster.”
The Catholic Church (in all its manifestations) and the other Christian Churches (in all their manifestations) do not hold the pathway to eternal life, we teach the pathway to eternal life, which has already been implanted in all human beings by God from the beginning. We are to enlighten … not to confine, not to bring non-Christians or Christians who do not believe all that we do into our spiritual coral, certainly not to “save souls for Jesus Christ.”
In this process, many wish to get closer to our institutions so that they might become more a part of the practices and come to greater understandings more quickly, but belonging to the institution is never a requirement.
God has been at work in this universe for 13.8 billion years. Religions have been around approximately 5,000 years, and Christianity 2,000 years. Clearly God does not need our institutions to make the work of God go on. We religious types merely ring bells around the edges. God doesn’t need us; the good luck is ours to be able to think about these blessings on a more constant basis. We can hopefully articulate the Sacredness in All for others, and help them to move more quickly toward their inevitable, eternal conclusion: recognition of their own Oneness within God.
Within the Catholic Diocese of One Spirit, we choose to live sacramentality in this way – not confined, not strangled in its officialdom or encrusted in liturgical concrete, but rather keeping an eye toward the movement of the Spirit of God wherever it makes itself most evident. While maintaining the sacredness of the historic seven sacraments, we wish to constantly bring life to the expression of these realities, and to make them radically meaningful to the participants and observers. We also recognize and celebrate other sacred moments and create liturgies or celebrations of many of them as well – meaningful, profound, reverberating. And we honor the sacredness of every moment of existence.
The Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Jesus
The more one reads the Bible, the more one comes to realize the brilliance of Jesus’ teaching – the methods as well as the substance. It is simple, yet cuts to the core of the very meaning of our world and of the pervasiveness of the Loving Begetter.
Given the importance of the Eucharist – the celebration of the Body and Blood of Jesus – in Christianity, and especially in Catholicism, it is difficult to believe that Jesus would have forgotten about it until the Last Supper. (Why don’t we hear about it until the last day of his three year ministry?) Did Jesus quietly thank God over and over again for reminding him of it at the last moment?
Or, perhaps, was Jesus saving this – his most powerful, ordered practice – as a “going-away gift?” Was he saving it, mentally gift-wrapped, as a surprise at the end of his ministry?
Probably not, on either count.
It is much more likely that the injunction to “do this” was a summation of all his teachings and a way for us to call those essential teachings to mind. He said do this “in remembrance of me.” Recognizing the heightened seriousness of his ministry rapidly coming to a conclusion, and at the time of his gathering with those he loved most one last time, it is highly probable that Jesus wanted to emphasize that which he had tried over and over to get his followers to realize: that everything already is the body and blood of God. If God’s Holy Spirit is the energy which moves/breathes life and existence into all that is, then everything is an individualized manifestation of God.
Jesus probably looked at the table, saw bread and wine, which was eaten at virtually every meal (and, surprisingly, is still a staple of meals worldwide), and said, “Look at this; this really is me.” Because God is the One out of which all manifestations of the Spirit flow, then everything already is the body and blood of God.
We now know that the mucus lining of our mouths replenishes itself every three hours. Skin replaces itself every 24 hours. 98% of our current body was not here last year. Our life force, our soul, takes food and drink and air, and makes “me” out of the physical elements of the earth. If I inhale a deep breath, I have inhaled billions upon billions of molecules, and it is highly likely that one of them was exhaled by a Chinaman yesterday, caught the jet stream, and I used that molecule to make me today. Thus, our spirits/souls use matter to put forth the body that we use to breathe in and out the universe, and to experience the wonder of the God Within.
Jesus said “the Father and I are one” and that “you are my brothers and sisters.” He asked, “Have you not read that you are Gods?” And he told us that “greater things than I do, you will do.” His whole ministry was a way of teaching: if you can’t believe that God dwells in you and is the Stuff of which you are made, then look at me. The dead rise; the lame walk; the blind see. And I am telling you that the same Life of God that has come to full fruition in me is also in you. You are to be like me.
The eating of the bread and wine and the recognition of the real presence of Jesus in them is the way Jesus left us to help us see the greater reality: that God’s real presence is in everything and in everyone. It is how we renew, in our lives, the teachings of Jesus’ ministry.
Jesus, it seems, meant this everyday occurrence to be a constant reminder of the most life-changing and life-giving insight we can possess: that God manifests God’s Self in everything and in everyone.
If each of us could only keep this in mind on a more constant basis, then we would hold all the earth and the universe in the reverence that it deserves. We would not pollute it. We would not try to amass it for ourselves. We would not keep it from others. We would not view it as our possession, to do with it as we pleased. Not only would we not harm God’s expression in physical creation, but we would rather embrace it as what it is: a 13.8 billion year long process bringing us to the experience of God in the plethora of God’s expressions. We would know the earth to be holy, to be sacred, to be a pathway for us to experience who we are through these gifts strewn on our path.
Moreover, if we could keep Jesus’ teaching in mind about God being expressed in each human manifestation of God, then we would not only refrain from using other people to our own selfish plans, but we would honor them, hold them in awe. We would accept their limitations as time capsules in which their eternal and perfect spirits come to this earth life to experience that perfection we originally only know theoretically. Through choices of good (the experience of beauty, joy and love) and evil (the misguided attempts to find ourselves, which turn out to distance us from our true selves, but turn us back to who we really are through the experience of pain and disappointment) we discover God Within.
If only we had a way to keep these truths in the forefront of our consciousness.
And we do. Given to us by Jesus is the cleverest of ways, what we call the Eucharist. For this practice, meant to be integral to our everyday life is as good a way as we will ever find.
It is interesting to note that Jesus’ sharing of his body and blood were informal, everyday affairs. The Last Supper was a raucous as a large family dinner, such as our Thanksgiving, could be. There were men, women and children all around. Everyone was talking, and, in all probability, time for announcements and common prayer and singular focus was limited in duration. The sharing of his body and blood was a part of the meal, not separate.
After the resurrection, the two disciples on the way to Emmaus who brought Jesus to their place of rest that evening “recognized him in the breaking of the bread.” This does not sound too formalized, too ritualized, too set apart, too “sanctified” and “hallowed.” This sounds like an integration into everyday life.
How much of a disservice to Jesus’ intention do we not give this great gift, when we make its reception a distant, ritualized, solemnified for only certain consecrated hands, taken out of daily life experiences? Should we really store that which is to direct us to a higher understanding in a gold tabernacle, reverence it in a monstrance, or adore it all night long – or should we honor it in its more profound presence in the other reflections of God we meet daily? Do we defeat its purpose by only participating in this ritual away from our homes, away from our daily lives, once a week or once a month? Have we sapped most of the meaning out of what Jesus left us as the most practical way to connect with his primary teaching?
This is important. Jesus gave us a way to help us to remember the most substantive of his teachings, the part which makes everything else make sense, which brings it all together. Should this not be a part of our everyday lives? Should we not find a way to do it often?
In the early church, celebration of the body and blood of Jesus was not necessarily solemnized by a priest. It was done by the head of the family or friends gathered. We can do it that way again today. And we should.
Return to Pastoral Letters Listing
|
|